NCAA Tournament 2023 Stats And Profiles: No. 3-5 Seeds East And West Regions

March Madness is set to tipoff and the 2023 NCAA Tournament is set for record wagering, as I outline in Forbes via the American Gaming Association. I’ve outlined the stats and profiles for the top teams in my coverage for OSGA. The No. 3-5 Seeds East and West regions will be popular picks in bracket pools and betting as the tournament progresses.

Check out the stats and profiles, including No. 1 and No. 2 seeds in the East and West along with the South and Midwest regions. I’ve also added the No. 3-5 seeds South and Midwest region stats and profiles. Also, the top defensive teams are ones to watch as you evaluate the round-by-round matchups in the 2023 NCAA Tournament.

A March Madness primer and my keys to NCAA Tournament success may also assist you in your pursuit of profit when wagering on college basketball and March Madness.

Opening round odds are also provided in my bracket and breakdown NCAA Tournament coverage for Forbes, and lines and odds are always subject to change.

See the East and West Region (No. 3-5 seeds) profiles and additional detailed stats and odds in my NCAA Tournament coverage at Off Shore Gaming Association.

East Region – No. 3-5 seeds

No. 3 Kansas State (23-9), including 20-12 ATS

KenPom Strength of Schedule: 14
KenPom Stats: Adjusted Offense No. 51, Defense No. 19

Kansas State’s NET ranking is No. 24, and the Wildcats went 9-8 vs Quad 1 opponents and 4-1 vs Quad 2.

No. 4 Tennessee (23-10), including 17-16 ATS

KenPom Strength of Schedule: 35
KenPom Stats: Adjusted Offense No. 48, Defense No. 2

Tennessee’s NET ranking is No. 4, and the Volunteers went 7-7 vs Quad 1 opponents and 3-3 vs Quad 2.

No. 5 Duke (26-8), including 15-19 ATS

Duke’s NET ranking is No. 4, and the Blue Devils went 5-6 vs Quad 1 opponents and 7-2 vs Quad 2.

West Region – No. 3-5 seeds

No. 3 Gonzaga (28-5), including 13-18-1 ATS

KenPom Strength of Schedule: 60
KenPom Stats: Adjusted Offense No. 1, Defense No. 76

Gonzaga’s NET ranking is No. 6, and the Bulldogs went 6-4 vs Quad 1 opponents and 5-0 vs Quad 2

No. 4 UCONN (25-8), including 21-11-1 ATS

KenPom Strength of Schedule: 42
KenPom Stats: Adjusted Offense No. 6, Defense No. 18

Connecticut’s NET ranking is No. 8, and the Huskies went 7-6 vs Quad 1 opponents and 6-1 vs Quad 2.

No. 5 St. Mary’s (26-7), including 17-13-2 ATS

KenPom Strength of Schedule: 73
KenPom Stats: Adjusted Offense No. 39, Defense No. 8

St. Mary’s NET ranking is No. 8, and the Gaels went 2-3 vs Quad 1 opponents and 7-2 vs Quad 2.